Acting Role Trap

Tactics of Organizational PoliticsStructure and AuthorityA tactic to guard againstAlso known as Permanent Interim

Someone is given an acting title, the full blame for a hard mandate, and little of the authority, then is replaced by a permanent appointee who can disown the unpopular decisions.

An example

A packaged-foods company decided to consolidate its frozen desserts subsidiary and close two of its four plants. The parent chief executive named the subsidiary's vice president of operations acting president, with an understanding that was never written down: carry out the plan over twelve months, and the permanent job would be discussed. Spending above $250,000 still needed parent approval, hiring was frozen, and the charter was unchanged. The acting president negotiated with the union, announced both closures, and took the local press calls. At month fourteen the parent hired a permanent president from outside. At the first town hall, the new president said mistakes had been made in how the consolidation was handled. The acting president was offered a director role at headquarters.

Why it works

An acting holder works as a heat shield. Unpopular work flows through them, so senior leaders keep their own reputations clear, and once a stand-in is available, any senior leader who takes the hit personally looks naive. The implied promise of confirmation makes hard execution feel like an audition with real upside. The title also weakens the holder's judgment, since subordinates and peers wait for the real appointment, and pushing back risks the confirmation. It needs an ambitious holder with few outside options, a culture that treats acting titles as serious enough to blame and easy to discard, and enough time between the unpopular decisions and the permanent appointment.

The thinking behind it

Niccolò Machiavelli The Prince (1532) advises rulers to leave affairs of reproach to others and keep acts of grace for themselves, with the example of Cesare Borgia, who put a harsh deputy in charge of pacifying the Romagna and then had him executed so the cruelty would not be traced to Borgia. The acting role is a milder corporate version: unpopular execution flows through a stand-in, and the permanent appointee arrives free to disown it.

Erving Goffman In On Cooling the Mark Out (1952), Goffman describes how organizations help people who have lost a role accept the loss without protest, often by offering a substitute status that lets them save face. The director role at headquarters offered to a departing acting president is that substitute status. Recognizing it for what it is helps the holder negotiate real terms before accepting the acting role, when refusal still has power.

Warning signs

Title and blame come with the role, but budget, hiring, and charter authority do not. The promised advancement stays vague and unwritten. The acting status runs past a year while the holder carries out the hardest mandates. Peers and subordinates say they will wait for the permanent appointment. A search for the permanent role stays open, or reopens as the hard work finishes.

How to defend yourself

Negotiate when you can still say no, which is before you accept.

  • Ask what unpopular work has to be done before the permanent appointment, and whether that work is the actual job.
  • Put the authority into the role in writing: budget limits, hiring, signature rights.
  • Ask for a confirmation date, or automatic conversion after a set period, and a written commitment about your position afterward.
  • During the interim, build a constituency of your own with customers, the board, and peers, so you are harder to discard.
  • Keep outside options open. A credible alternative shortens how long you will tolerate the role, and the sponsor will know it.

Declining is a legitimate answer when the terms do not come.

How a leader shuts it down

Put time limits on acting status and write in automatic conversion or a decision date. Give acting holders the authority the role needs, since execution suffers when decisions cannot be made to stick. Senior sponsors should own unpopular mandates in public. A permanent appointee who disowns the inherited decisions should be asked who made them.

Back to the catalog