A tool designed to maximize the creative potential of a group.
Builds on brainwriting (Bernd Rohrbach's Method 635, Absatzwirtschaft, 1969, and the brainwriting pool and pin cards of Horst Geschka, G. R. Schaude, and H. Schlicksupp at the Battelle Institute, Frankfurt, Chemical Engineering, 1973), Alex F. Osborn's brainstorming rules (Applied Imagination, 1953), Jiro Kawakita's affinity diagram (the KJ method, Hassoho, 1967), and the COCD box's originality and feasibility screen (COCD, Antwerp).
What it is for
The purpose of the Collective Idea Explorer thinking tool is multifaceted, making it an essential asset for effective problem-solving in group settings. The key functions and benefits of this tool include:
- Enhanced Idea Generation. The tool provides a structured approach for participants to independently generate ideas, promoting creativity and a diversity of perspectives. This process helps in surfacing a broad range of solutions.
- Collaborative Refinement. By allowing team members to review, refine, and build upon each other's ideas, the tool fosters collaboration and collective intelligence. This results in more refined and well-thought-out ideas.
- Balanced Participation. The structure of the tool ensures that all participants have an equal opportunity to contribute, reducing the likelihood of domination by more vocal members and ensuring a more inclusive brainstorming session.
- Idea Categorization and Analysis. The tool helps in organizing ideas into categories and themes, making it easier to identify patterns and key insights. This categorization aids in a deeper understanding of the ideas and their potential impact.
- Objective Evaluation. The final idea evaluation table allows for a systematic assessment of each idea based on feasibility and creativity, ensuring that the selection process for potential implementation is balanced and objective.
- Efficient Problem-Solving. By combining individual ideation with group collaboration, the tool efficiently harnesses the group's collective expertise, leading to quicker problem-solving and innovation.
- Adaptability to Various Contexts. The tool's versatile nature makes it suitable for a wide range of scenarios, from business challenges to creative projects, and for groups of different sizes and compositions.
- Encouragement of Continuous Improvement. The iterative nature of the process encourages ongoing enhancement of ideas, promoting a culture of continuous improvement and development.
In essence, the Collective Idea Explorer is designed to maximize the creative potential of a group, ensure a democratic and inclusive process, and provide a structured approach to problem-solving, making it an invaluable tool for teams seeking to generate innovative solutions and make informed decisions.
Why use it
Each participant first comes up with their own ideas. They then review, refine, or enhance the ideas suggested by others in the team. This technique is highly effective for rapidly generating ideas in a big group. This is an effective problem-solving tool for several reasons:
- Combines Individual and Group Strengths. This technique merges the benefits of both personal reflection and group brainstorming. It allows participants to think independently without group pressure, leading to more diverse and original ideas. Then, these ideas are collectively reviewed and enhanced, benefiting from the group's combined creativity and insights.
- Encourages Open Idea Exchange. By working independently and then sharing, there's an open exchange of ideas. This method ensures that all voices are heard and considered, which is often not the case in traditional group brainstorming where dominant personalities can overshadow others.
- Maintains Creative Momentum. Shifting between individual and group work maintains a high level of creative energy. It keeps participants engaged and motivated, as they see their ideas being built upon by others.
- Rapid Idea Generation. This approach is particularly effective for quickly generating a large volume of ideas. This rapid ideation can be crucial in situations where time is of the essence or when a wide range of solutions is desired.
- Anonymity in Idea Sharing. The option to distribute ideas anonymously can encourage more honest and creative input. It reduces the fear of judgment or rejection, which can inhibit idea generation in a more open setting.
- Structured Process. The step-by-step procedure provides a clear framework for problem-solving. It guides participants through the process of ideation, collaboration, and refinement, leading to more organized and productive brainstorming sessions.
- Comprehensive Idea Evaluation. By first generating and then categorically reviewing ideas, the technique allows for a thorough examination of all potential solutions. This comprehensive review increases the chances of uncovering the most creative and feasible solutions.
- Versatility. This technique can be adapted to various problems and groups of different sizes and compositions. It's suitable for a wide range of scenarios, from business challenges to creative projects.
In summary, this thinking tool is highly beneficial for problem-solving as it harnesses the collective intelligence of a group while respecting individual thought processes, leading to a richer set of ideas and solutions.
How to use it
- Define the problem or situation needing ideas.
- Individually create 3 to 5 ideas on separate cards.
- Choose a method to distribute cards for anonymity: (a) pass to the next person; (b) place in the center for anyone to pick; (c) have someone collect, shuffle, and redistribute.
- Spend 15 to 20 minutes enhancing ideas: (a) add to or comment on existing ideas; (b) if a new idea is inspired, write it on a new card. Encourage all ideas, aim for quantity, defer judgment.
- Collect cards, group into categories (refer to the affinity diagram).
- Use categories and ideas for group brainstorming to create more ideas.
- Review all ideas to find the most creative and feasible.
Key concepts to keep in mind
- Initiation: Problem Statement. Define the problem in a clear, concise statement placed at the center or top of the workspace.
- Ideation: Idea Creation. Each participant writes down their ideas on cards: aim for quantity and variety.
- Distribution: Anonymity Mechanism. Choose one: (a) pass cards to the right; (b) collect and shuffle cards for random distribution; (c) place cards in the center for free selection.
- Development: Idea Expansion. Participants draw a card from the pool and build upon the idea, adding their thoughts or new perspectives.
- Iteration: New Idea Generation. If an idea on a card inspires a new thought, participants write this on a new card and add it to the pool.
- Organization: Categorization. Group cards into themes using an affinity diagram method to identify patterns and clusters of ideas.
- Convergence: Group Synthesis. In a group setting, discuss categorized ideas to synthesize and combine into more polished concepts.
- Evaluation: Selection of Solutions. Review the refined ideas to select the most creative and actionable solutions.
The three tables a session fills before the scoring
The idea generation, enhancement, and categorization tables in the order the session fills them, one line per participant, card, or category in each box. Copy the canvas when you are done; nothing is saved.
Idea Generation Table
Participant Name
One participant per line.
Ideas
Idea 1, Idea 2, and Idea 3 for each participant.
Comments
Notes on each participant's ideas.
Idea Enhancement and Feedback Table
Original Idea
The idea on the card.
Enhancements/Build-Ups
Improvements on the original idea.
New Ideas Inspired
New ideas the card sparked, each on a new card.
General Feedback
Feedback on the original idea.
Idea Categorization Table
Category
One category per line.
Ideas Included
The list of ideas under each category.
Key Insights
The key insights from each category.
CopiedCould not copy
The final idea evaluation, ranked as you score
Write each idea from the tables above, then score it from 1 to 10 for feasibility (how practical and implementable it is) and for creativity (how original and innovative). The list under the scores ranks the ideas by the average of the two.
Average of all scores
VerdictScore every idea on both counts.Top ideas firstUse these scores to identify top ideas for potential implementation.
Top ideas first
- Idea from Idea Generation 1
- Idea from Idea Generation 2
- Idea from Idea Generation 3
- Idea from Enhancement Table 1
- Idea from Enhancement Table 2
- Idea from Enhancement Table 3
Where it fits
The process recommends it at Expansive Idea Formation, the second step of the Vision phase, where it is the one tool named for filling the inventory of ideas before any are judged.
Related tools
Within this series, the Ease-Impact Assessment Matrix takes the shortlist on to a second screen, by impact and ease rather than feasibility and creativity, and FOCUS Ideation is the other tool for generating ideas.
- Mind Mapping (Buzan)
- Affinity Diagram (Kawakita)
- Brainwriting 6-3-5 (Rohrbach)
- Nominal Group Technique (Delbecq, Van de Ven, and Gustafson)